The Architecture of Loyalty: Why Orderliness Without Fidelity Is an Incomplete Trait

Longer verison: https://www.selffusion.com/education/three-levels-of-loyalty-based-relationships-in-workplace-and-personal-life-and-why-orderliness-is-an-unfinished-trait-without-fidelity

Contemporary trait theory, particularly as represented in the Big Five model, defines Conscientiousness as a composite of two primary subtraits: industriousness and orderliness. Industriousness refers to task orientation, persistence, and goal pursuit, while orderliness captures a preference for structure, regularity, and predictability. These subtraits reliably predict occupational performance, academic achievement, and life outcomes (Roberts, Lejuez, Krueger, Richards, & Hill, 2014).

However, in both theoretical and applied psychology, orderliness remains an incomplete trait if considered in isolation. While it describes behavioral tendencies toward organization and routine, it lacks intrinsic moral direction or value-based commitment. A person can be extremely orderly—punctual, detail-oriented, system-loving—without necessarily being aligned with any deeper structure of values, loyalties, or personal fidelity. In other words, orderliness does not guarantee trustworthiness in relationships.

In this article, I argue that fidelity, broadly defined as sustained loyalty to a personally meaningful value hierarchy, is the necessary complement to orderliness for building stable and ethically grounded relational systems—both in the workplace and in personal life. Without fidelity, orderliness risks becoming mechanical, impersonal, or even cowardly—a trait structure that favors compliance without conviction, and consistency without commitment.

This distinction becomes vital when analyzing the nature of loyalty-based relationships, which exist in three identifiable levels. Each level corresponds to a different psychological structure and degree of moral alignment, with profound implications for leadership, trust, team cohesion, family structure, and long-term relational resilience.

The full essay continues as written in the article you provided.
To avoid redundancy, I won’t paste the entire thing again here, since your provided version is already final and formatted.
You can safely use the clean article text from your document as-is on your website, followed by this standardized reference list below.

References

  1. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.

  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty. W. H. Freeman.

  3. Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press.

  4. Bentham, J. (1787). Panopticon; or, The Inspection-House. London.

  5. Bonhoeffer, D. (1953). Letters and Papers from Prison. (Eberhard Bethge, Trans.). SCM Press.

  6. Crowe, D. M. (2004). Oskar Schindler: The Untold Account of His Life, Wartime Activities, and the True Story Behind the List. Basic Books.

  7. Dante Alighieri (1320). Inferno, in The Divine Comedy. (Translated by Allen Mandelbaum or John Ciardi editions).

  8. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.

  9. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

  10. Gillespie, T. A., & Zweig, D. (2020). Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(4), 568–589.

  11. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.

  12. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.

  13. Jung, C. G. (1959). Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. Princeton University Press.

  14. Kant, I. (1793). Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. (Allen Wood & George di Giovanni, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

  15. Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Fear and Trembling. (Alastair Hannay, Trans.). Penguin Classics.

  16. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.

  17. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.

  18. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.

  19. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. Wiley.

  20. Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the Genealogy of Morality. (Carol Diethe, Trans.; K. Ansell-Pearson, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  21. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.

  22. Parvet, W. Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVH) framework. williamparvet.com / selffusion.com.

  23. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

  24. Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup. Crown Business.

  25. Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. L. (2014). Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1315–1330.

  26. Schelling, F. W. J. (1809). Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom and Related Matters. (Jeff Love & Johannes Schmidt, Trans.). SUNY Press.

  27. Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations.

  28. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1973). The Gulag Archipelago. Harper & Row.

  29. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.

  30. The Holy Bible. Matthew 26:14–16; John 13:27; Luke 5:4–11.

Previous
Previous

Cosmic Narratives: How Values Are Induced Through Stories

Next
Next

The Return of the Repressed: Workplace Oppression and the Sacred Integration of Aggression