Anti-Aletheia and the Collapse of Repression: Layered Concealment in Stage Three of the DGM Model and the Restorative Function of Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVHs)
In previous work, the four-stage DGM ("Dorian Gray Model") of repression pathology was introduced as a conceptual framework to understand the progressive deterioration of the psyche when faced with self-inflicted distortion of truth. The model, inspired by Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray, illustrates how an initial deliberate distortion cascades into layers of repression, ultimately leading to psychological collapse.
Note: as many students and clients ask immediately for the long version link, in co-operation with SelfFusion, here it is:
https://www.selffusion.com/education/anti-aletheia-as-concealment-through-layered-repression-in-stage-three-of-the-dgm-model-and-the-role-of-sivhs-as-a-reconstruction-mechanism
This essay focuses on the third stage, characterized by what I term Anti-Aletheia — the opposite of Heideggerian aletheia or "unconcealment." In this stage, the psyche becomes dominated by automated concealment processes, marked by complex layers of self-deception and moral disengagement. I will explore how this repression architecture not only reinforces neurotic tendencies but also severs the individual from authentic Being, and how Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVHs) can function as a remedy.
The Four Stages of Repression: Overview of the DGM Model
Stage One involves a conscious decision to distort reality, such as Dorian Gray’s fateful wish or a modern individual’s deliberate betrayal of core values. Stage Two is marked by minimization, rationalization, and externalization of responsibility, allowing temporary relief through cognitive distancing.
The third stage, however, is where repression becomes entrenched and toxic. The psyche shifts into Anti-Aletheia, building layers of defense mechanisms that distort reality to an unsustainable degree. Eventually, this results in the fourth stage, where the accumulated psychic burden collapses, triggering crisis or catharsis.
Anti-Aletheia: A Heideggerian and Psychological Synthesis
Drawing on Heidegger's concept of aletheia, which sees truth as an unfolding process of unconcealment, the third stagecan be understood as a pathological refusal to allow Being to reveal itself. The psyche no longer permits openness to truth but instead constructs an architecture of concealment, burying the initial transgression under layers of denial, rationalization, and dissociation.
This process aligns with Freud's secondary repression, but when viewed through a Heideggerian lens, it takes on ontological implications: the individual not only represses events or actions but loses contact with Being itself. Anti-Aletheia represents a severing of the individual from their existential core, resulting in a fabricated self that is increasingly fragmented.
The Mechanics of Anti-Aletheia and The Lost Highway Effect
This phenomenon is well-illustrated by the Lost Highway Effect, named after David Lynch’s film, where repression is visualized as a protagonist’s entrapment within a disorienting, cyclical reality. The person constructs a “new normal” filled with pleasant facades, yet cracks appear as repressed truths resurface.
Each new layer of defense consumes mental and emotional resources, contributing to neurotic escalation. As cognitive bandwidth is increasingly dedicated to sustaining the repressive structure, the individual’s capacity for authentic engagement with reality diminishes, manifesting as both volatility (emotional lability) and withdrawal (social and existential detachment).
The Tipping Point: Collapse Under Compound Weight
The compounding weight of concealment leads to what cognitive psychology would recognize as a form of ego depletion (Baumeister et al., 1998). Maintaining the repressive system exacts a toll on the psyche, increasing the likelihood of sudden emotional collapse or moral breakdown.
Externally, individuals may appear emotionally detached, but internally they teeter on the brink of crisis. This explains the symptomatic "numbness" and passivity often observed in this stage—a byproduct of psychic overload.
A Real-World Illustration: Self-Deception in Interpersonal Betrayal
Consider the example of an individual who betrays a spouse through infidelity but refuses to confront the betrayal. Over time, they may assert bold declarations such as:
“Honesty is my core value.”
“I am fundamentally a good person.”
“My spouse is abusive and narcissistic.”
These are not neutral statements — they function as defensive projections within the Anti-Aletheia dynamic, insulating the individual from moral reckoning. The more intense and absolute these proclamations become, the more they signal the deepening of the concealment structure.
The Role of SIVHs in Reconstruction
Breaking free from the Anti-Aletheia cycle requires not only dismantling the repressive architecture but also reorienting the psyche toward an integrated and future-oriented structure. Here, Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVHs) become critical.
By installing a singular, monotheistic value at the apex — be it truth, service, or devotion — the individual re-establishes a moral and existential anchor. This top value re-orders internal priorities, facilitating the return to aletheia and re-engagement with authentic Being.
However, this intervention is rarely successful unless the individual is willing to confront the core deception and take absolute responsibility for their actions. In most therapeutic settings, this necessitates catalyzing the collapse phase sooner, thus creating conditions for genuine repentance and reconstruction.
Conclusion
The third stage of repression pathology — the Anti-Aletheia stage — is a critical juncture where individuals can either spiral toward existential breakdown or begin the arduous process of reintegration. The interplay between concealment dynamics and the eventual collapse underscores the need for interventions that go beyond surface-level symptom management.
The implementation of SIVHs offers a promising pathway for restoring coherence, authenticity, and resilience. Positioned at the intersection of existential ontology, clinical psychology, and organizational behavior, this model invites further interdisciplinary exploration.
Some of the References Used for the Article
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Hamann, S. (1999). Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1111-1117.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2010). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880-896.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1927/1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
Heidegger, M. (1949/2001). Off the Beaten Track (J. Young & K. Haynes, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. Yale University Press.
Lynch, D. (1997). Lost Highway [Film]. Asymmetrical Productions.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213-225.
Wilde, O. (1890/2003). The Picture of Dorian Gray. Penguin Classics.
